Day 626 – Ken here (M)(5-30-2011)
(DEF II, v.4 Ch.39 pp.540-550)(pages read: 1600)
Feeling very tired and very slow-in-the-head-and-even-slower-on-the-uptake – so pardon the blathering and the rambling.
And…another slow Gibbon day. Much hinting of Theodoric. Much mention of Theodoric. Much praise of Theodoric. Basically, a lot on Ostrogothic Italy – mainly on how good times were, how cheap and plentiful stuff was, and how LITTLE the Catholics were persecuted by their new Arian Ostrogothic masters.
Gibbon’s time, the Enlightenment delighted in denigrating all things medieval with one overarching adjective – Gothic. That the Goths, be they Ostrogoths, Visigoths, or any other Goths had nothing to do with the Middle Ages didn’t stop them from mis-using the name of the Gothic nation and making it into a kind of 18th century cuss word.
All that made about as much sense as the word “gay” meaning “bad”. It was all just a fad (I’ll stop rhyming the end of my sentences now.) That all was going to change in the near future as the Enlightenment was shredded by the 19th century and wildly out-of-control Romanticism – – – and then the general idea of “Gothic”, although somewhat dark and sinister, was manifestly attractive and also took on more sentimental overtones of knights-in-shining-armor-castles-and-damsels-in-distress.
In the 20th century there was a kind of popular “renaissance” (if you can use that word to refer to the Middle Ages) of interest in all things Medieval (one odd ex. the wildly successful Simon and Garfunkel song “Scarborough Fair”) and the idea of Gothic being a word you used to denote absolute disdain disappeared – relegated to the same place the English subjunctive went and all those Jacobean thee’s and thou’s – i.e. the trash-bin of linguistic history. There the phrase slept in peaceful dis-use.
Until, that is, the late 20th century, when Gothic became associated with overly heavy use of mascara and white powder on the face, and a general attitude of rebellion and a kind of simmering malevolence and oddly active depression – where it has stayed ever since – so much so, that persons surfing the web, and looking for new ways to apply black makeup to various parts of their faces often find themselves NOT LOOKING at photos of young, pale, and disenchanted people, but reading (or NOT READING) my pages on Theodoric the Ostrogoth’s Italy. Such are the vagaries of the human condition and popular culture.
Not any of which has much to do, if anything actually, with Gibbon’s treatment of Theodoric and the nation of Goths he led.
Just thought I’d mention that.
Even Gibbon gets it all mixed up when he mentions one face of one of Theodoric’s coins showing his imperial palace and representing the first “Gothic” architecture.
As often as the peace of his kingdom was threatened (for it was never invaded) by the Barbarians, he removed his court to Verona (70) on the northern frontier, and the image of his palace, still extant on a coin, represents the oldest and most authentic model of Gothic architecture.
(DEF ii, vol.4, ch.39.p. 544)
Currency/Measure Conversion – from 1780’s Pound Sterling to 2008 $1 US, and translating ancient Roman Dry Weight Measures to US Measures
The wine came out to about $1 a bottle (1 bottle being a quarter gallon)
The wheat came out to about $40 a bushel.
A farthing is worth approx 1/960 of a British Pound – a British Pound of the 1780’s could be translated into current purchasing power as $1,600 (See Currency Conversion Page – link in the header above). So, 1/960 x 1,600 = $1.66 1 farthing x 3 = $4.99 for a gallon of wine or about one dollar a bottle (if it were bottled). Not Bad.
A shilling is 1/20 of a British Pound – – a British Pound of the 1780’s could be translated into current purchasing power as $1,600 (See Currency Conversion Page – link in the header above). So, 1/20 x 1,600 = $80.00 (also, 1 pence = 4 farthings = $6.64. 5 shilling 6 pence = 5 x 80 + 6 X 6.64 = $439 for 60 modii of wheat which comes out to about 11 bushels – or about $40 a bushel – a very high price for today.
However, nowadays a bushel of wheat costs about $10 – so even the cheap prices that Gibbon talks about can’t stand up to 21st century Modern-Wheat-Growing-And-Marketing-Efficiencies.
Which means we’re doing better than the late 400’s in Barbarian Conquered Italy – altogether a GOOD THING
Leave a comment